Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi, Sakarya\u2019da g\u00f6r\u00fclen bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda emsal niteli\u011finde bir karar verdi. Mahkeme, kad\u0131na yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 ba\u011flan\u0131p ba\u011flanmayaca\u011f\u0131na karar verilirken, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131ndan gelen kiran\u0131n ve taraflar aras\u0131ndaki mal rejimi davas\u0131 sonucunun da g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131na h\u00fckmetti.
\n
Sakarya\u2019da bir \u00e7ift kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 olarak bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131. Aile Mahkemesi\u2019nde g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada, erkek e\u015fin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 reddedilirken, kad\u0131n e\u015fin davas\u0131 kabul edildi. Yerel mahkeme, bo\u015fanma y\u00fcz\u00fcnden yoksullu\u011fa d\u00fc\u015fece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle kad\u0131n e\u015f lehine maddi ve manevi tazminat ile yoksulluk nafakas\u0131na h\u00fckmetti. Karar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan her iki taraf da avukatlar\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla karar\u0131 temyiz etti. Dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi, i\u00e7tihat de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi niteli\u011finde bir karar vererek yerel mahkemenin h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc nafaka y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bozdu. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi bozma ilam\u0131nda, erke\u011fin emekli oldu\u011fu, buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k kad\u0131n\u0131n gelir getiren ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekti. Kararda, kad\u0131n\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131ndan elde etti\u011fi kira gelirinin miktar\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi vurguland\u0131. Daire ayr\u0131ca, taraflar aras\u0131nda devam eden veya sonu\u00e7lanan “mal rejiminin tasfiyesi” davas\u0131n\u0131n da yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 karar\u0131nda etkili olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti. Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, kad\u0131n\u0131n mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan alaca\u011f\u0131 pay\u0131n ve kira gelirlerinin, onu yoksulluktan kurtar\u0131p kurtarmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi, nafaka \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n bu do\u011frultuda yeniden de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fine karar verdi.<\/p>\n
Nafaka belirlemesinde yeni kriter
\n
Sakarya\u2019da g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019ne ta\u015f\u0131nan kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda erke\u011fin davas\u0131n\u0131n reddedilip kad\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesiyle ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan emsal karar\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren Avukat Fatih Karamercan, Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n nafaka takdirinde devrim niteli\u011finde bir ad\u0131m att\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti. Karamercan, yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihatlarda gelir getirici ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n nafaka hesab\u0131nda dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak bu yeni kararla birlikte e\u015fler aras\u0131ndaki mal rejiminin tasfiyesi davas\u0131n\u0131n da art\u0131k nafaka belirlemesinde kilit bir rol oynayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulayarak, “Yarg\u0131tay, yaln\u0131zca ta\u015f\u0131nmaz gelirlerini de\u011fil, mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 davas\u0131ndan elde edilmesi muhtemel kazanc\u0131n da de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fine h\u00fckmetti. Buna g\u00f6re, mal rejimi davas\u0131n\u0131n sonucu ve buradan gelecek maddi imkanlar dikkate al\u0131narak nafakan\u0131n tamamen kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, hi\u00e7 h\u00fckmedilmemesine veya miktar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesine karar verilebilecek” dedi.<\/p>\n
Mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ve nafaka ili\u015fkisi
\n
2002 y\u0131l\u0131nda Medeni Kanun\u2019da yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklik sonras\u0131 e\u015flerin, di\u011fer e\u015fin edinilmi\u015f mallar\u0131n\u0131n yar\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 talep etme hakk\u0131 kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bunun yan\u0131nda tazminat taleplerinin de g\u00fcndeme geldi\u011fini hat\u0131rlatan Karamercan, mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan y\u00fcksek bedeller elde edilmesine ra\u011fmen nafaka y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn devam etmesinin, nafakay\u0131 \u00f6deyen e\u015fi yoksullu\u011fa s\u00fcr\u00fckledi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki ele\u015ftirilerin bu kararla kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k buldu\u011funu dile getirdi. Somut olayda oldu\u011fu gibi, derdest bir mal rejimi davas\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 halinde hakimin buradan gelecek geliri hesaba katmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirten Karamercan, “\u00d6rne\u011fin Ahmet Bey ile Ay\u015fe Han\u0131m\u2019\u0131n bo\u015fanmas\u0131nda, Ay\u015fe Han\u0131m\u2019\u0131n mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan alacakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kma ihtimali art\u0131k nafakan\u0131n belirlenmesinde do\u011frudan etkili olacak. Medeni Kanun\u2019un y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinden 23 y\u0131l sonra gelen bu karar, gecikmeli de olsa hukuki ve hakkaniyete uygun, son derece \u00f6nemli bir i\u00e7tihat niteli\u011findedir” ifadelerini kulland\u0131.
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi, Sakarya\u2019da g\u00f6r\u00fclen bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda emsal niteli\u011finde bir karar verdi. Mahkeme, kad\u0131na yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 ba\u011flan\u0131p ba\u011flanmayaca\u011f\u0131na karar verilirken, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131ndan gelen kiran\u0131n ve taraflar aras\u0131ndaki mal rejimi davas\u0131 sonucunun da g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131na h\u00fckmetti. Sakarya\u2019da bir \u00e7ift kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 olarak bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131. Aile Mahkemesi\u2019nde g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada, erkek e\u015fin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 reddedilirken, kad\u0131n…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":79050,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-79049","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-guncel"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.egemtv.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79049","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.egemtv.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.egemtv.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.egemtv.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.egemtv.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=79049"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.egemtv.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79049\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":79051,"href":"https:\/\/www.egemtv.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79049\/revisions\/79051"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.egemtv.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/79050"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.egemtv.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=79049"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.egemtv.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=79049"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.egemtv.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=79049"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}